Patty says
April 11th, 2007The Sugar of a Georgia peach
April 11th, 2007Accenture Partner Garret Wu: Health Info Prototype Is One Small Step
April 11th, 2007Why do you need Adaptive Control?
April 11th, 2007Adaptive Control
April 10th, 2007Kenya Making Connections to Global Outsourcing Infrastructure
April 10th, 2007Retiring Convergys Leader Sees Fortune 500 in Company’s Future
April 10th, 2007Revitalizing Business Restructuring
April 10th, 2007BPR's particular strength was its focus on identifying core processes in a business and examining ways in which these processes could be honed to achieve corporate goals more effectively. The idea was that a process could be made cheaper and more responsive to customer needs by stripping away peripheral activities and bureaucratic layers.
BPR was not about entering new markets or introducing new products. It was about re-arranging existing processes with the help of new technology. The rise of BPR coincided with the widespread adoption of new I.T. systems based on PCs, networks and the Internet. They permitted more decentralization by improving communications, which allowed firms to strip out layers of middle management and cut more costs as the recession took hold.
The advocates of BPR said it required these four basic actions:
- Assess fundamental organizational objectives;
- Identify core processes;
- Clarify objectives and identify associated goals; and
- Achieve reform through reorganization and the incorporation of new technology.
That may have been a reasonable basis for organizational restructuring at the time, but the approach incorporated critical weaknesses.
There are two main conceptual difficulties with BPR. First, it has an inherently high level of disregard for the impact it may have in social and behavioral terms. BPR's cost savings were usually achieved through staff reductions, so the movement became associated with waves of job cuts that were often implemented by consultancy firms brought in for the purpose.
Organizations that survived re-engineering...
How To Live Up to the Innovation Hype
April 10th, 2007"Yeah, Iridium isn't around any more. It went bankrupt in 2000," one of the museum-goers said as he looked at a display of an Iridium satellite. Desch wanted to tell the men that Iridium is actually still around after private investors resurrected it in 2001 and that the company saw $212 million in sales and $54 million in profits in 2006.
Desch walked closer to the display and discovered why the men were misinformed about Iridium's current profitable state. The plaque beside the satellite read like an obituary, declaring Iridium's life span from 1999 to 2000. According to the sign, Iridium -- initially funded by Motorola in 1998 to an avalanche of publicity -- was kaput, after going bankrupt when the phones failed to catch on with consumers. To Desch's dismay, the museum sign had no information about the company's subsequent resurrection and current success.
"Iridium had such a public failure and a private success later. Failure looms as the biggest thing that happened to us," says Desch, who joined the company in 2006. But Iridium, based in Bethesda, Md., is now growing, with increases in revenues, profits, and other metrics such as rising user numbers in new markets, like military, disaster relief, aviation, and utilities. Iridium's service has 180,000 subscribers, and those numbers are growing at a rate of 15% to 20% per year.
Other "Next Big Thing" companies that, like Iridium,...